User research readout

How clinic front desks actually spend their mornings

Semi-structured interviewsn = 12Jun 8 – Jul 3 2026Five clinic groups, 45–60 min eachResearch: Priya Wendt, Mara Chen

So what

The front desk does not need a better waitlist screen — it needs the waitlist to stop being a decision it makes in public. Coordinators avoid the task for emotional reasons as much as time, which means automation that removes the choice is more welcome than automation that speeds it up. And every participant accepted automation faster when a visible log existed, whether or not they ever read it.

Themes

Interruption load is the job

Every participant described their day as a queue of interruptions rather than a sequence of tasks. The phone always wins, because the person in front of them can see them not answering it.

“If the phone rings during check-in, somebody loses.”
P7 · Office manager, 6 clinics
“I do not have a morning. I have forty interruptions with gaps.”
P2 · Front-desk coordinator

Tool-switching costs more than any single tool

Participants moved between three and six systems per patient interaction. Nobody complained about a specific product; they complained about the seams between them.

“Four tabs to move one appointment. I know all four well. That is not the problem.”
P4 · Patient access lead
“I keep a paper list because it is the only thing that survives switching windows.”
P11 · Front-desk coordinator

The waitlist is emotional labour, not admin

Calling waitlisted patients means delivering good news to one person and nothing to nine others. Three participants said they avoided the task for that reason, not for time.

“You are calling to say yes to one person and ignoring nine who also waited.”
P9 · Office manager, 3 clinics
“I would rather leave the slot empty than pick wrong in front of a room.”
P3 · Front-desk coordinator

Trust is built by visibility, not accuracy

Participants accepted automation faster when they could see what it had done, even when they never checked. Two explicitly said they stopped looking after a week — but needed the log to exist.

“I looked at the list every day for a week. Then I stopped. I still want it there.”
P5 · Patient access lead
“If I cannot see what it told the patient, I have to phone them anyway.”
P8 · Office manager, 9 clinics

Managers and coordinators want opposite things

Managers asked for reporting and control; coordinators asked for fewer decisions. Features designed for one group were consistently described as overhead by the other.

“Do not give me another dashboard. Give me eleven fewer phone calls.”
P12 · Front-desk coordinator
“I need to know it happened, per site, without asking anyone.”
P1 · Regional operations manager

Severity against frequency

Happens occasionally
Happens daily
High severity
Picking wrong in publicManager reporting gaps
Interruption loadWaitlist avoidanceTool-switching
Low severity
Locum provider mapping
Paper backup listsDashboard fatigue

Surprises

Nobody blamed a tool. We expected complaints about the PMS. Twelve of twelve blamed the seams between systems instead.
The waitlist is avoided for emotional reasons. Three participants described guilt, unprompted. None of our previous research surfaced this.
The audit log is a comfort object. Participants stopped reading it within a week but insisted it must exist. Removing it would cost trust we did not know we had bought.

Recommendations, ranked

#RecommendationThemes addressedEffort
01Ship auto-fill so the offer decision is made by the system, not the coordinatorInterruption load, waitlist avoidanceLarge
02Keep the per-slot offer trail permanently visible, even after clinics stop reading itTrust by visibilitySmall
03Split the interface: coordinators get actions, managers get reporting — never both viewsOpposite needsMedium
04Reduce cross-system steps for a reschedule from four tabs to oneTool-switchingMedium
05Write the fairness rule down and show it to patients: “offered in waitlist order”Picking wrong in publicSmall